Does Python have “private” variables in classes?
Private variables in python is more or less a hack: the interpreter intentionally renames the variable.
class A:
def __init__(self):
self.__var = 123
def printVar(self):
print self.__var
Now, if you try to access __var
outside the class definition, it will fail:
>>> x = A()
>>> x.__var # this will return error: "A has no attribute __var"
>>> x.printVar() # this gives back 123
But you can easily get away with this:
>>> x.__dict__ # this will show everything that is contained in object x
# which in this case is something like {'_A__var' : 123}
>>> x._A__var = 456 # you now know the masked name of private variables
>>> x.printVar() # this gives back 456
You probably know that methods in OOP are invoked like this: x.printVar() => A.printVar(x)
, if A.printVar()
can access some field in x
, this field can also be accessed outside A.printVar()
...after all, functions are created for reusability, there is no special power given to the statements inside.
The game is different when there is a compiler involved (privacy is a compiler level concept). It know about class definition with access control modifiers so it can error out if the rules are not being followed at compile time
It's cultural. In Python, you don't write to other classes' instance or class variables. In Java, nothing prevents you from doing the same if you really want to - after all, you can always edit the source of the class itself to achieve the same effect. Python drops that pretence of security and encourages programmers to be responsible. In practice, this works very nicely.
If you want to emulate private variables for some reason, you can always use the __
prefix from PEP 8. Python mangles the names of variables like __foo
so that they're not easily visible to code outside the class that contains them (although you can get around it if you're determined enough, just like you can get around Java's protections if you work at it).
By the same convention, the _
prefix means stay away even if you're not technically prevented from doing so. You don't play around with another class's variables that look like __foo
or _bar
.